Timeline for Schemey - lexer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 30, 2017 at 13:16 | comment | added | Chris | @greybeard While I appreciate the advice, I think my question is perfectly fine and legible the way it is. So I'll be leaving alone. | |
May 30, 2017 at 7:04 | comment | added | Chris | @greybeard Honestly, I think that it would be to much to ask. The file for the parser might be okay, but both the compiler and the virtual machine are somewhat long. And on top of that, they both depend on many other files which are several hundred lines long. This would mean a reviewer may have to read the other files. And I really don't think anyone would feel like doing that :-) If your still interested in the project though, your welcome to look through the source files. | |
May 29, 2017 at 23:35 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
link to GitHub commit at the time of the posting of this question
|
May 29, 2017 at 22:09 | history | edited | Chris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 253 characters in body; edited title
|
Mar 19, 2017 at 22:19 | history | edited | Chris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 19 characters in body
|
Mar 19, 2017 at 22:18 | vote | accept | Chris | ||
Feb 8, 2017 at 6:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/829212495755755521 | ||
Feb 7, 2017 at 20:53 | comment | added | Chris |
@Yes and no. In the case of my implementation of Scheme, then a syntax error should be raised. However, the official scheme standard, vectors and characters are both prefixed with # .
|
|
Feb 7, 2017 at 20:21 | comment | added | Graipher |
Is a # followed by anything other than t or f legal Scheme syntax or should this raise an exception?
|
|
Feb 7, 2017 at 19:17 | answer | added | alecxe | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 7, 2017 at 18:42 | history | asked | Chris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |