Timeline for Disproving Euler proposition by brute force in C
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 31, 2016 at 15:55 | comment | added | David Hammen | @MartinBonner -- Taking modulo 3 says that either none of a, b, and c can be multiples of 3, or that exactly two of a, b, and c must be multiples of 3. Modulo 5 is a bit more helpful: Exactly two of a, b, and c must be multiples of 5. | |
Oct 27, 2016 at 14:57 | history | edited | mascoj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correction to logic
|
Oct 26, 2016 at 10:52 | comment | added | Martin Bonner supports Monica | So with @DanUznanski simplification, if a is odd, both b and c must be even, if a is even, b can be either, and c must be the opposite parity to b.. That means the search space is cut in just over half. Can we do similar tricks with mod 3 calculations? | |
Oct 26, 2016 at 1:42 | comment | added | Dan Uznanski | Actually it gets even better than this: all even numbers, when taken the to the fourth power, are divisible by 16, and all odd numbers, when taken to the fourth power, have a remainder of 1 when divided by 16. So it must be -- since having all of a, b, c, and d even means there's a smaller solution -- that d must be odd and exactly one of a, b, and c must be odd as well, because that's the only way to get the same remainder mod 16 on both sides. | |
Oct 26, 2016 at 0:19 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 26, 2016 at 3:53 | |||||
Oct 26, 2016 at 0:17 | history | answered | mascoj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |