Timeline for Is the string a pangram?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25 at 21:38 | comment | added | Filip Cordas | it's strange how answers get down voted | |
| Sep 29, 2016 at 11:36 | comment | added | paparazzo | @Johnbot Did not claim to be thread safe. Just a simple fast implementation. | |
| Sep 29, 2016 at 8:05 | comment | added | Johnbot | This implementation isn't thread-safe. | |
| Sep 29, 2016 at 5:17 | comment | added | janos | It's nice that you put out an implementation, and benchmark results, it's just that none of this reviews the posted code by OP. As such, I'm afraid this is not an answer on Code Review. Do take a look at our how-to-answer page. | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 17:16 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 198 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 17:06 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 198 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 16:33 | comment | added | t3chb0t | I didn't test it but I believe you ;-) and I didn't DV you. I suggest you write a few more words about your code. Perhaps this is what they don't like. | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 16:30 | comment | added | paparazzo | @t3chb0t it is faster than yours by a fact of 10 | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 16:20 | comment | added | paparazzo | @t3chb0t It is not really the votes I am concerned about. I want to know what is the problem? | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 12:59 | comment | added | paparazzo | Down votes what is the problem? I don't think you are going to do it faster than this. | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 3:13 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 3:05 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 2:52 | history | answered | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |