Timeline for Print 10 × 10 square of X and O characters, split diagonally
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 12:08 | history | edited | Pimgd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling fixes.
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 12:00 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 186 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 11:35 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 11:29 | comment | added | Jens | @Downvoter: be so fair and tell why you downvote | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:16 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:15 | history | edited | Pimgd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
documentation link, and I cleaned up spelling here and there
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:15 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:13 | history | edited | Pimgd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
documentation link, and I cleaned up spelling here and there
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:10 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 139 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:07 | comment | added | Pimgd | @Jens That's good for explaining your solution, but what I'm missing is how this improves on the original code. I know it may seem tedious to have to explicitly describe the improvements, but imagine OP is really new to Java programming - describe WHY your solution is better so that the OP can judge changes by himself | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:03 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 188 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 8:30 | history | edited | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 6:14 | vote | accept | Shammy | ||
| Sep 2, 2016 at 14:37 | |||||
| Sep 2, 2016 at 6:01 | history | answered | Jens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |