Timeline for CodeAbbey #21 Array Counters
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2016 at 10:03 | comment | added | Gurkenglas | Well you can ask lambdabot: ircbrowse.net/browse/… or did you disagree on something else than (+) on Int being strict in both arguments? | |
| Aug 14, 2016 at 9:35 | comment | added | R B | I don't believe that's true, but it could very well depend on optimization settings or have changed in some recent (to me) GHC version. Do you have a cite? | |
| Aug 14, 2016 at 8:33 | comment | added | Gurkenglas | Your plus should not change anything about building up of thunks, right? (+) on Ints is already strict. "If the accumulating function is strict, then accumArray is strict in the values, as well as the indices, in the association list." from those same docs says we're safe. | |
| Aug 14, 2016 at 1:58 | history | edited | R B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
oops
|
| Aug 13, 2016 at 23:26 | history | answered | R B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |