Timeline for Repository Pattern with Dapper + Unity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 15:12 | comment | added | Xavier Peña | @t3chb0t Thanks, I'll be waiting for the edit. I will unmark the "answered" temporary so other people is not mislead by the tag until the code does what it was intended to do. Please notify me via comments so I can read it and mark it as answered. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 15:05 | comment | added | t3chb0t | @XavierPeña I think you're right. I confused unity with something else but now I see it's a DI container so it actually doesn't do anything useful there now. There is a lot to read about it 3 - Dependency Injection with Unity I'll look at it another time. This is quite interesting so I'll post another edit when I get how it actually works. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 14:50 | comment | added | Xavier Peña |
@t3chb0t Thanks for the elegant implementation, specially inheriting from ConnectionBase and putting all the verbose stuff there. At the same time, I have a problem understanding how _unityContainer interacts with the code... wouldn't the code work exactly the same if all three lines that interact with UnityContainer(the declaration + 2 lines in the constructor) were removed from the code?
|
|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 14:37 | vote | accept | Xavier Peña | ||
| Aug 6, 2016 at 15:11 | |||||
| Aug 6, 2016 at 14:24 | comment | added | t3chb0t | @XavierPeña see the edit. I hope it helps ;-] | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 14:23 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3410 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 13:53 | comment | added | Xavier Peña |
@t3chb0t I am free to change it as long as I understand the core concepts, and at this point my confidence in that is not very high. That's why I was asking. Other than that, in the pastebin link I was trying to implement it without the verbose _connection.Connection.Open(). If you post the proper changes (specially regarding the actual use of UnityContainer) I would like to mark the question as answered. This my last version of the code for UnityConnection, in case it helps: pastebin.com/vpjhrfzx
|
|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 13:45 | comment | added | t3chb0t | @XavierPeña I guess so. I'm not a unity expert but you're free to write anything that works for you inside the constructor :-] It should just demonstrate the general model and how it can be encapsulated. I'm sorry it didn't work the first time. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 13:42 | comment | added | Xavier Peña |
@t3chb0t I'm sorry, I've been playing with the code and I've suddenly realized that your _unityContainer, despite registering the Connection, it actually does nothing (I think?). Could it be solved with a simple this.Connection = _unityContainer.Resolve<IDbConnection>(); in the last line of the UnityConnection constructor?
|
|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 12:59 | comment | added | Xavier Peña | @eurotrash I liked t3chb0t answer, and I wanted it to match the requisite you highlighted. I've proposed a possible solution in this pastebin: pastebin.com/0ETTpcWc (instead of creating a new answer), so if t3chb0t is OK with it / wants to improve it, it can be added to the original answer. | |
| Aug 5, 2016 at 4:06 | comment | added | t3chb0t | @eurotrash oh, you're right, I need to fix this later. | |
| Aug 5, 2016 at 4:03 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Aug 4, 2016 at 10:32 | comment | added | 404 |
But to do anything on the connection you would have awkward syntax e.g. _connection.Connection.Open(). If IConnection does nothing but contain an IDbConnection then you might as well use IDbConnection directly imo.
|
|
| Aug 3, 2016 at 18:53 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 26 characters in body
|
| Aug 3, 2016 at 18:47 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Aug 3, 2016 at 18:30 | history | answered | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |