Timeline for 196-Algorithm Program
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 22:05 | vote | accept | Anthony Pham | ||
| Mar 8, 2016 at 13:54 | history | edited | Anthony Pham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2016 at 2:56 | comment | added | jscs |
a > 9 does not test for a two-digit number, it tests that the number has more than one digit. Is that a flaw in your description of the algorithm?
|
|
| Mar 8, 2016 at 2:48 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 2:36 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
|
| Mar 8, 2016 at 1:23 | comment | added | Jerry Coffin | For what it's worth, this question/algorithm (and the oddity of 196 when reversed and added this way) has been around a long time. Just for example, it was in the inaugaral issue of one of the first magazines for small computers: Creative Computing | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 | history | asked | Anthony Pham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |