Timeline for Type erasure and deferred function calls for any function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 17:10 | comment | added | Deduplicator | @cr_oag: Though that introduces lifetime-issues. If you say that's ok, sure. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 16:24 | comment | added | cr_oag |
You need to change the capture mode in make_deferred_invoker() from = to & to fix the performance issue.
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:20 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:15 | comment | added | Deduplicator | @croag: I was too clever for my own good when putting the ultimate base into the template. Moved it out. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:13 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 67 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 4:27 | comment | added | cr_oag | Here's a demo: coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/acde6b81f38d67e9 | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 4:06 | comment | added | cr_oag |
Yeah, perfect forwarding is important for that reason. Also, there seems to be an issue when calling your submit() with functions that have void return types. Try with this signature void f( int );.
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 3:45 | comment | added | Deduplicator | Well, all function-arguments are copied or moved into the lambda. Do you want some not to be copied? | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 3:38 | comment | added | cr_oag |
I've done some simple timing tests and yours is faster when copying POD's. However, there must be some sort of issue with the deductions going on, because even if the function has a const&, it is copied, making it a lot slower.
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 2:06 | comment | added | Deduplicator |
Well, now there are two levels of type-erasure: Max, only useful for calling invoke and delete. Intermediate, all but moving works. No type-erasure.
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 2:03 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 1:49 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 26 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 1:46 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 84 characters in body; deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 1:30 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 1:09 | history | undeleted | Deduplicator | ||
| Oct 12, 2015 at 1:08 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 352 characters in body
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 22:05 | history | deleted | Deduplicator | via Vote | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 21:56 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 174 characters in body
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 21:47 | comment | added | cr_oag | You are definitely correct about the rule of 3/5. I overlooked that. | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 21:34 | history | edited | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 97 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 21:23 | history | answered | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |