| bio | website | rmartinho.github.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Berlin, Germany | |
| age | 26 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 1 month |
| seen | 2 days ago | |
| stats | profile views | 78 |
I like to (re)invent wheels. I am starting to like Unicode. Despite what others might say, I am not a Unicode expert. I have a personal website.
When I quote the C++ standard, I do it from a relatively up-to-date build of the sources at http://github.com/cplusplus/draft. (last build August 29th, 20121)
Trying to contact me? I usually hang out by the C++ Lounge. If you prefer e-mail, I sometimes check this mailinator mailbox: M8R-gt1qwe@mailinator.com.
1 it will remain a bit out-of-date until I get my build machine set up again; meanwhile, you can get a more recent official draft, N3485.
|
Apr 16 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 12 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 7 |
awarded | Taxonomist |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
C++ vs D - Algorithm Optimization/Conversion (Using vectors/arrays) @Dr.Kameleon sorry, I only know C++ :) I would probably get rid of log2, but from there I have no idea. |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
C++ vs D - Algorithm Optimization/Conversion (Using vectors/arrays) @Dr.Kameleon optimisations in the code are a pointless exercise if you request of the compiler to make a slow program. |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
C++ vs D - Algorithm Optimization/Conversion (Using vectors/arrays) What further optimisations? What about... -O3? |
|
Jan 26 |
comment |
Naive C++ Matrix Multiplication 100 times slower than BLAS? And two threads. |
|
Jan 26 |
comment |
Naive C++ Matrix Multiplication 100 times slower than BLAS? "I believe both are using only a single core." There is no way the BLAS version is using only one core: note how CPU time is about twice as much as wall clock time. |
|
Dec 15 |
revised |
C++ My matrix class added 6 characters in body |
|
Aug 19 |
comment |
C++ My matrix class Yeah, that looks good. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
C++ My matrix class @R.M. obviously feel free to disregard the parts about iterators right until you start understanding them. If you decide to get on with and have trouble I'll be happy to help you with it on Stack Overflow or giving advice here :) |
|
Aug 17 |
revised |
C++ My matrix class added 5 characters in body |
|
Aug 17 |
revised |
C++ My matrix class deleted 1 characters in body |
|
Aug 17 |
answered | C++ My matrix class |
|
Aug 8 |
comment |
C++ shared_singleton Konrad mentioned that someone in the C++ chat had some other solution. That was me: gist.github.com/3284629. However that solution doesn't allow for reinitialization, which you seem to desire. To be honest, the way it is now, this looks like a nice question for StackOverflow instead. |
|
Aug 4 |
answered | Is this predicate valid to delete single shared_ptr's? |
|
Jun 26 |
comment |
Thread-safe singleton class using std::shared_ptr in C++(11) This is off-topic. codereview.SE is for working code. This doesn't even compile. |
|
Jun 22 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Checking if a string is a number with STL It's not elegant if it has code for special cases (that's part of my definition of elegant). |
|
Apr 20 |
comment |
Edit Distance Between Two Strings @user1131467 No, it's not only a problem when you do that. It's also a problem when you forget to using namespace phoronix and now you're inadvertedly using std::ref when you meant phoronix::ref, but the compiler doesn't help you in the slightest there. It's also a problem when ADL picks up the wrong things because you never intended for ADL to be doing anything here. Wrapping an #include in a namespace is also a bad idea that will probably lead to linker errors down the line. |