Take the 2-minute tour ×
Code Review Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for peer programmer code reviews. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am building a web service that gets data via Stored Procedures from a db and provides the result as JSON. The solution is built as a MVC 4 Web API project. I have to retrieve the data via Stored Procedures for several reasons (security, SQLAnywhere db, etc).

It is a relatively small scale project so I have opted for not defining a Model in the Web Service layer to save work (and possibly performance). There will likely be models in the front end application (which will be a MVC 4 Web Application).

The reasons why I am including an extra layer in the form of a Web Service is to a) add extra security, and b) that there will likely be a iPhone app for part of the application which then can utilize the same web service as the site.

It is working as I want it to, so what I want feedback on is

  1. What do you think of the general approach to build a MVC 4 Web API solution without explicit models?
  2. Do you have any comments on how to improve the details of the implementation?

One potential thought I have had is to skip the dataset and make a direct call to the Stored Procedure and loop over a datareader, which could potentially be faster. The other potential change is to loop over the datatable and build up the JSON manually instead of using the serializer.

What I like about the current solution is that it can be done on very few lines of code and that I do not have to manually name each JSON object since it is inherited from the datatable within the dataset.

I define a dataset called dsProducts that is loaded with a TableAdapter.

    // GET api/products
    public string Get()

        string result = "";

        dsProductTableAdapters.GetProductsTableAdapter taTemp = new dsProductsTableAdapters.GetProductsTableAdapter();
        dsProducts dsTemp = new dsProducts();

        try {
            result = jsonHelper.convertJSONString(dsTemp.GetProducts);
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            result = "{\"error\":\"1\"}";

        return result;


The convertJSONString and its help functions are defined as:

    public static string convertJSONString(DataTable table)
        JavaScriptSerializer serializer = new JavaScriptSerializer();
        return serializer.Serialize(table.ToDictionary());

    static Dictionary<string, object> ToDictionary(this DataTable dt)
        return new Dictionary<string, object> {
            { dt.TableName, dt.convertTableToDictionary() }};

    static object convertTableToDictionary(this DataTable dt)
        var columns = dt.Columns.Cast<DataColumn>().ToArray();
        return dt.Rows.Cast<DataRow>().Select(r => columns.ToDictionary(c => c.ColumnName, c => r[c]));
share|improve this question
I believe taTemp and dsTemp are both objects of classes which implement IDisposable and therefore should be wrapped in using statements to ensure proper deterministic disposal. –  Jesse C. Slicer Mar 31 at 14:26
add comment

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.