Code Review Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for peer programmer code reviews. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a way to improve this SQL query? It involves multiple cross join and joins.

I have 3 tables, and I want to compute the cardinal product:

table N:

table sums:
    i   S
    1   22
    2   26
    3   22

table mults:
    i   j   M
    1   1   122
    1   2   144
    1   3   119
    2   1   144
    2   2   170
    2   3   141
    3   1   119
    3   2   141
    3   3   126

Here is a fiddle.

SELECT  ((N.n*M1.m)-(S1.s*S2.s)) / (SQRT((N.n*M2.m)-(pow(S1.s,2))) * SQRT((N.n*M3.m)-(pow(S2.s,2))))
CROSS JOIN sums as S1
CROSS JOIN sums as S2
JOIN mults as M1
     ON M1.i = S1.i
     AND M1.j = S2.i
JOIN mults as M2
     ON M2.i = S1.i
     AND M2.j = S1.i
JOIN mults as M3
     ON M3.i = S2.i
     AND M3.j = S2.i;
share|improve this question
Does it have to be done in SQL? I would suck the data out and do it in memory instead. There are some powerful matrix and numeric libraries out there. – Leonid Nov 17 '12 at 17:33
yeah, I know LAPACK for example but with sql queries? – cMinor Nov 17 '12 at 17:33
I agreed with @Leonid. Using a database like this is likely to fall apart if you try to apply this approach on a little larger data sets, but another issue is that it looks so much like a math problem that you really should use a math tool just to make it easier to maintain and debug later. – Michael Zedeler Nov 18 '12 at 21:24

This SQL, for what it does, is neat, and concise. There is no obvious place where any optimizations can be made. With the data size as small as it is, there is no reason to recommend indexes, or other improvements.

The only glaring issue has been pointed out already: There are tools other than SQL that are designed to do these types of heavy computation with performance that your database just won't beat.

Apart from anything else, the log functions are notoriously hard to get right, and there are multiple 'standards' for implementation.

Consider math libraries designed for data and computations such as this.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.